digg icon delicious icon

News Release: Lancaster County Commissioners Dismantle HRC

November 17, 2010   //     //   Homosexual Agenda

News Release
For Immediate Release:  November 17, 2010

Contact:  Diane Gramley   1.814.271.9078 or 1.814.437.5355

Lancaster County Commissioners Vote to Abolish Human Relations Commission

(Harrisburg) –  The Lancaster County Commissioners just voted this morning to save that county’s taxpayers over $470,000 a year by abolishing the Human Relations Commission (HRC).  The Commissioners were concerned about county taxpayers being forced to pay for a duplication of services – a statewide Human Relations Commission as well as one on the county level.  The American Family Association of Pennsylvania (AFA of PA), a statewide traditional values group, commends their decision.

The AFA of PA contacted County Commissioners Martin and Stuckey on August 4th with additional information concerning statements made in Doylestown (Bucks County) by openly homosexual Chairman of the PA Human Relations Commission, Stephen Glassman.  He worked extensively in Doylestown to “convince” them passage of a borough human relations ordinance and creation of a local human relations commission was necessary.   A July 20thIntelligencer article says, “And Glassman said the borough would only have to worry about cases involving discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity and expression; it could forward all other discrimination cases such as race, age, handicaps and so on, to his commission.”

“Stephen Glassman was involved in trying to convince the Lancaster County Commissioners that dismantling the HRC was a bad idea, but according to Glassman’s July 20th statement to the Doylestown Borough Council, what Lancaster has done is the right thing and he welcomes them to forward any civil rights complaints to his state office in Harrisburg.  Increasingly we see homosexual activists try to use these Commissions to get special rights for those involved in that lifestyle.  A June 29th meeting in Lancaster is a perfect example, as city of Lancaster homosexual activists tried to force the County Commissioners to not only keep the HRC, but to expand it to include sexual orientation. The city of Lancaster already has such language in its human rights ordinance, but that was not good enough,” remarked Diane Gramley, president of the AFA of PA.

Further homosexual activist groups from the Philadelphia area exerted pressure on the Commissioners to keep the HRC.

“Dismantling the County Commission does not mean more discrimination will take place; it does not take away anyone’s civil rights as is being claimed.  What this decision means is that two of Lancaster County’s three commissioners are fiscally conservative and concerned about where taxpayer dollars are spent,” Gramley noted.

# # #

Topics: , ,

Readers Comments (3)

  1. Dennis B. says:

    It is noteworthy how much Lancaster stands to save since Glassman advises the munis that the local commission is nearly cost-free when he does his promo for them to adopt the ordinance.

  2. afaofpa says:

    Yes, Doylestown Borough passed their ordinance in August having no idea what it would cost. Glassman advised them to get at a minimum a part time employee for the new human relations commission. His estimates for cost were between $30,000 for a part-time and $60,000 for a full time employee — plus supplies, mileage, and benefits.

  3. Ironclad says:

    The human toll of raising the level of acceptance of loose-living and concurrent disrespect for marriage is greatly multiplying to the fiscal amounts otherwise saved by governing entities. Much of this in fact shows up as substantial costs to the social, protective, and benefits arms of government.




Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.